بررسی اثرات نامتقارن نرخ ارز حقیقی بر تراز تجاری دوجانبه ایران با شرکای تجاری (منحنی J): کاربرد رویکرد CS-ARDL پانلی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

10.22075/jem.2025.38284.2019

چکیده

این مطالعه به بررسی تأثیر نرخ ارز حقیقی بر تراز تجاری دوجانبه ایران با ۲۶ شریک تجاری طی دوره زمانی 1981 تا 2023 می‌پردازد. با توجه به اینکه وابستگی مقطعی یک مسئله مهم در این متغیرها محسوب می‌شود و شواهد آماری قوی نیز آن را تأیید می‌کنند، از آزمون‌های ریشه واحد و هم‌انباشتگی نسل دوم و همچنین رویکرد ARDL تعمیم‌یافته مقطعی (CS-ARDL) که این وابستگی را لحاظ می‌کنند، استفاده شده است. علاوه بر این، عدم تقارن در واکنش تراز تجاری به تغییرات مثبت و منفی (با مقدار یکسان) نرخ ارز بررسی شده است. نتایج آزمون‌های هم‌انباشتگی وسترلاند نشان می‌دهند که یک رابطه بلندمدت میان تراز تجاری و نرخ ارز حقیقی، درآمد حقیقی شرکای تجاری و درآمد حقیقی ایران وجود دارد. بنابراین، مدل تصحیح خطای مبتنی بر رویکرد CS-ARDL برای برآورد این رابطه بلندمدت و پویایی‌های کوتاه‌مدت با استفاده از برآوردگر میانگین گروهی ترکیبی با اثرات مشترک همبسته پویا (DCCEPMG) برآورد شده است. برآوردها نشان می‌دهند که تغییرات نرخ ارز حقیقی در هر دو افق بلندمدت و کوتاه‌مدت دارای اثرات مثبت و متقارنی بر تراز تجاری هستند؛ به‌گونه‌ای که تضعیف (کاهش ارزش) پول ملی موجب بهبود و تقویت (افزایش ارزش) آن موجب بدتر شدن تراز تجاری ایران می‌شود. بنابراین، اگرچه اثرات بلندمدت با فرضیه منحنی J متقارن سازگاری دارند، اما تعدیلات کوتاه‌مدت این فرضیه را تأیید نمی‌کنند. با این وجود، شرط مارشال-لرنر نه تنها در بلندمدت، بلکه در کوتاه‌مدت نیز برقرار است. افزون بر این، نتایج نشان می‌دهند که در بلندمدت، درآمد حقیقی ایران اثر منفی و درآمد حقیقی شرکای تجاری اثر مثبت و معناداری بر تراز تجاری ایران دارند. یافته‌های این پژوهش بینش‌های مفیدی برای سیاست‌گذاران اقتصادی در راستای تدوین سیاست‌های مؤثر ارزی و تجاری با هدف بهبود تراز تجاری ایران ارائه می‌دهند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Asymmetric Effects of the Real Exchange Rate on Iran’s Bilateral Trade Balance with Its Trading Partners (J-Curve): An Application of the Panel CS-ARDL Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Elahe Ariya Movahed 1
  • Amin Haghnejad 2
1 M.A. Student in Economics, Faculty of Economics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Economics, Faculty of Economics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

This study investigates the impact of the real exchange rate on Iran’s bilateral trade balance with 26 trading partners over the period 1981–2023. Given the significant presence of cross-sectional dependence among the variables—supported by strong statistical evidence—second-generation panel unit root and cointegration tests, as well as the Cross-Sectionally Augmented ARDL (CS-ARDL) approach, are employed to account for this feature. Furthermore, the potential asymmetry in the trade balance’s response to positive and negative changes in the real exchange rate is examined. Results from Westerlund cointegration tests confirm the existence of a long-run relationship between the trade balance, the real exchange rate, Iran’s real income, and the real income of its trading partners. Accordingly, an error correction model based on the CS-ARDL framework is estimated using the Dynamic Common Correlated Effects Pooled Mean Group (DCCEPMG) estimator to capture both the long-run relationship and short-run dynamics. The estimates reveal that real exchange rate changes have positive and symmetric effects on the trade balance in both the long and short run. Specifically, a depreciation of the domestic currency improves the trade balance, while an appreciation worsens it. Hence, while the long-run results are consistent with the symmetric J-curve hypothesis, the short-run adjustments do not support the J-curve effect. Nevertheless, the Marshall–Lerner condition holds not only in the long run but also in the short run. Furthermore, the findings show that, in the long run, Iran’s real income has a significant negative effect, whereas the real income of its trading partners has a significant positive effect on Iran’s trade balance. The findings of this study provide useful insights for economic policymakers in formulating effective exchange rate and trade policies aimed at improving Iran's trade balance.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Real Exchange Rate
  • Bilateral Trade Balance
  • J-Curve
  • Iran
  • Panel CS-ARDL
References:
Ahmadi Shadmehri, M. T., & Ahmadian Yazdi, F. (2012). The study of the impact of real exchange rate on the Iran’s non-oil trade. Journal of economics and regional development19(3), 114-155. (In Persian)
Akhbari, M., & Khoshbakht, A. (2006). Dynamics of Trade Balance: Bilateral J Curve of Iran versus Germany. Journal of Economic Research, 41(3), 123-160. (In Persian)
Andrews, D. W. (2005). Cross‐section regression with common shocks. Econometrica, 73(5), 1551–1585.
Ansarinasab, M., Sattari, O., & Zeynali, E. (2021). Investigating the Asymmetric effects of terms of trade on Iran's trade balance: test of J and S curves through NARDL method. New economy and trad16(2), 25-55. (In Persian)
Ari, A., Cergibozan, R., & Cevik, E. (2019). J-curve in Turkish bilateral trade: A nonlinear approach. The International Trade Journal, 33(1), 31–53.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M. (1991). Is there a long-run relation between the trade balance and the real effective exchange rate of LDCs? Economics Letters, 36(4), 403–407.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Arize, A. C. (2020). Asymmetry cointegration and the J-curve: New evidence from Africa. Journal of Economic Studies, 47(5), 969–984.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Baek, J. (2025). Is there a J-curve effect in the Korean service trade? The International Trade Journal, 39(4).
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Fariditavana, H. (2015). Nonlinear ARDL approach, asymmetric effects and the J-curve. Journal of Economic Studies, 42(3), 519–530.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Fariditavana, H. (2016). Nonlinear ARDL approach and the J-curve phenomenon. Open Economies Review, 27, 51–70.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Harvey, H. (2017). Bilateral trade balances of Malaysia with her 11 largest trading partners: New evidence from asymmetry cointegration. Global Economic Review, 46(2), 143–161.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Kantipong, T. (2001). Bilateral J-curve between Thailand and her trading partners. Journal of Economic Development, 26(2), 107–117.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Karamelikli, H. (2023). Is there J-curve effect in the US service trade? Evidence from asymmetric analysis. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 28(4), 3865–3875.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Nasir, M. A. (2020). Asymmetric J-curve: Evidence from industry trade between US and UK. Applied Economics, 52(25), 2679–2693.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Ratha, A. (2004). The J-curve: A literature review. Applied Economics, 36(13), 1377–1398.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Aftab, M., & Karamelikli, H. (2025). Russia's trade with G7 countries and asymmetric J-curve effect. The World Economy, 64(1), 113–120.
Bahmani‐Oskooee, M., Arize, A. C., & Kalu, E. U. (2022). US‐South America trade and the J‐Curve: An asymmetric analysis. The World Economy, 45(12), 3858-3872.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Bose, N., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Asymmetric cointegration, nonlinear ARDL, and the J-curve: A bilateral analysis of China and its 21 trading partners. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(13), 3131–3151.
Baltagi, B. H., Feng, Q., & Kao, C. (2012). A Lagrange multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model. Journal of Econometrics, 170(1), 164–177.
Banerjee, A., & Carrion-i-Silvestre, J. L. (2015). Cointegration in panel data with structural breaks and cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 30(1), 1–23.
Banerjee, A., Marcellino, M., & Osbat, C. (2005). Testing for PPP: Should we use panel methods? Empirical Economics, 30, 77–91.
Barkat, K., Jarallah, S., & Alsamara, M. (2024). Do exchange rate changes improve the trade balance in GCC countries: Evidence from nonlinear panel cointegration. The International Trade Journal, 38(2), 184–200.
Breitung, J., & Pesaran, M. H. (2007). Unit roots and cointegration in panels. In L. Mátyás & P. Sevestre (Eds.), The econometrics of panel data: Fundamentals and recent developments in theory and practice (pp. 279–322). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253.
Carbaugh, R. (2022). International economics (18th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Chudik, A., & Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of Econometrics, 188(2), 393–420.
De Silva, S., Hadri, K., & Tremayne, A. R. (2009). Panel unit root tests in the presence of cross-sectional dependence: Finite sample performance and an application. Econometrics Journal, 12(3), 340–366.
De Vos, I., & Everaert, G. (2021). Bias-corrected common correlated effects pooled estimation in dynamic panels. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 39(1), 294–306.
Ebrahimi, M., Hojabr-Kiani, K., Memarnezhad, A., & Ghffari, F. (2018). Investigating the Asymmetric Effects of Exchange Rate Fluctuations on the Trade Balance of Iran and China by Nonlinear ARDL Approach. Financial Economics, 12(44), 21-40. (In Persian)
Ebrahimi, M., Memarnejad, A., & Ghaffari, F. (2019). Comparison of Asymmetric Effects of Exchange Rate Fluctuations on Iran's Trade Balance with Germany and Turkey. New economy and trad14(3), 1-17. (In Persian)
Esmaili, S., Ghahramanzadeh, M., Mahmodi, A., Mehrara, M., & Yavary, G. (2020). The impact of exchange rate and oil price fluctuations on Iran's agriculture trade balance: application of the J curve approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics & Development, 34(2), 179-200. (In Persian)
Felipe, J., Pérez-Montiel, J. A., & Ozcelebi, O. (2025). Do changes in the real exchange rate affect the trade balance? Evidence from European countries. Open Economies Review, 1–27.
Ganai, S. G., & Khan, J. A. (2025). An asymmetric NARDL approach to the J-curve phenomenon and export competitiveness in India–US trade. Cogent Economics & Finance, 13(1).
Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271.
Heidari, H., & Zarei, F. (2012). Investigating the commercial relations between Iran and its other major trading partner focusing on J-Curve Test. Quarterly Journal of Economic Modeling, 6(2), 83-103. (In Persian)
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74.
Iqbal, J., Nosheen, M., & Rehman Panezai, S. G. (2021). Asymmetric cointegration, non-linear ARDL, and the J-curve: A bilateral analysis of Pakistan and its trading partners. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(2), 2263–2278.
Junz, H. B., & Rhomberg, R. R. (1973). Price competitiveness in export trade among industrial countries. American Economic Review, 63(2), 412–418.
Juodis, A., & Reese, S. (2022). The incidental parameters problem in testing for remaining cross-section correlation. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 40(3), 1191–1203.
Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), 1–44.
Karimi, M. S., Ghaderi, S., & Seifoori, J. (2019). Asymmetric Effects of Real Exchange Rate Changes on the Trade between Iran and China. Journal of Economics and Modelling10(3), 29-59. (In Persian)
Kazerooni, A., & Mojiri, H. (2011). The Impact of Domestic Currency Depreciation on the Bilateral Trade Balance of Iran with her Six Major Trading Partners. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 15(45), 77-102. (In Persian)
Kazerooni, A., Mohammadpoor, S., & Feshari, M. (2011). Testing J and S Curves in the Case of Iran (1976-2007)(J Curve and S Curve Approaches). The Journal of Economic Studies and Policies, 0(20), 3-20. (In Persian)
Krueger, A. O. (1983). Exchange rate determination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krugman, P. R., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. J. (2022). International economics: Theory & policy (12th ed., Global ed.). Pearson.
Lerner, A. P. (1944). The economics of control: Principles of welfare economics. New York: Macmillan.
Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24.
Magee, S. P. (1973). Currency contracts, pass-through, and devaluation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1973(1), 303–325.
Marshall, A. (1923). Money, credit, and commerce. London: Macmillan.
Mehrara, M., & Abedi, A. (2017). Exchange Rates and Trade Balance: The Case of Iran. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 9(31), 1-26. (In Persian)
Memarian, E., & Jalali Naeini. S. A. (2010). The Effects of Short and Long-Run Exchange Rate Shocks on Trade Balance of Iran (a VECM Approach for Testing J-Curve). Economics Research, 10(37), 45-69. (In Persian)
Mohammadi, H., & Ariabod. A. (2010). Survey the Effect of Exchange Rate Adjustment on Iran and South Korea Trade Pattern (J-Shaped Curve). Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 17(52), 169-181. (In Persian)
Mohseni, R., & Ranjbar, V. M. (2022). Exchange rate pass-through on non-oil trade balance in Iran. Journal of Money and Economy, 17(1), 89–114.
Mwito, M. M., Mkenda, B. K., & Luvanda, E. (2021). The asymmetric J-curve phenomenon: Kenya versus her trading partners. Central Bank Review, 21(1), 25–34.
Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1994). Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. The Review of Economic Studies, 61(4), 631–653.
Nusair, S. A. (2017). The J-curve phenomenon in European transition economies: A nonlinear ARDL approach. International Review of Applied Economics, 31(1), 1–27.
Parray, W. A., Bhat, J. A., Yasmin, E., & Bhat, S. A. (2023). Exchange rate changes and the J-curve effect: Asymmetric evidence from a panel of five emerging market economies. Foreign Trade Review, 58(4), 524–543.
Pedram, M., Shirinbakhsh, S., & Rahmani, M. (2012). The J-Curve dynamics of Iran foreign trade. Journal of Economic Research and Policies19(60), 5-18. (In Persian)
Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 653–670.
Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20(3), 597–625.
Pesaran, H., Smith, R., & Im, K. S. (1996). Dynamic linear models for heterogeneous panels. In L. Mátyás & P. Sevestre (Eds.), The econometrics of panel data: A handbook of the theory with applications (pp. 145–195). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels (Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435). Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74(4), 967–1012.
Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312.
Pesaran, M. H. (2015a). Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econometric Reviews, 34(6–10), 1089–1117.
Pesaran, M. H. (2015b). Time series and panel data econometrics. Oxford University Press.
Pesaran, M. H. (2021). General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empirical Economics, 60(1), 13–50.
Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1995). An autoregressive distributed lag modeling approach to cointegration analysis. In S. Strom, A. Holly, & P. Diamond (Eds.), Centennial volume of Ragnar Frisch (pp. [insert page numbers if known]). Cambridge University Press.
Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, R. (1995). Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 79–113.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621–634.
Phillips, P. C., & Sul, D. (2003). Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence. The Econometrics Journal, 6(1), 217–259.
Rasekhi, S., & Rostami, A. (2013). Bilateral J-Curve among Iran and Selected Partners. journal of islamic finance research1(1), 37-50. (In Persian)
Reinert, K. A., Rajan, R., Glass, A. J., & Davis, L. S. (Eds.). (2009). The Princeton encyclopedia of the world economy. Princeton University Press.
Rose, A. K., & Yellen, J. L. (1989). Is there a J-curve? Journal of Monetary Economics, 24(1), 53–68.
Sarafidis, V., & Wansbeek, T. (2012). Cross-sectional dependence in panel data analysis. Econometric Reviews, 31(5), 483–531.
Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In W. C. Horrace & R. C. Sickles (Eds.), Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt: Econometric methods and applications (pp. 281–314). Springer.
Tari, F., Esmaeilpour Moghadam, H., & Dehbashi, V. (2018). Investigating the J Curve in the Trade relations of Iran using the Aggregate Trade Balance Approach. New economy and trade, 13(3), 57-72. (In Persian)
Tayebi, S. K., Yazdani, M., & Khanzadi, A. (2010). Iran's Trade Balance and Dynamics of the J-Curve Mechanism in the Uncertainty Conditions. Journal of Monetary and Banking Research, 2(3), 93-114. (In Persian)
Van Marrewijk, C. (2012). International economics: Theory, application, and policy (2nd rev. ed.). Oxford University Press.
Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709–748.
Yazdani, M., & Jangi, R. (2017). Real Exchange Rate and Mechanism of J and S Curves among Iran and its Major Trade Partners. Journal of Economics and Modelling7(28), 31-53. (In Persian)
Yazgan, M. E., & Ozturk, S. S. (2019). Real exchange rates and the balance of trade: Does the J-curve effect really hold? Open Economies Review, 30, 343–373.